Jul
27
Last Friday I posted on the fact that 26% of all mortgage defaults are “strategic” — where the homeowner can afford the mortgage but chooses to walk away, most often because of negative equity (when the homeowner owes more on the mortgage than the home is worth).
I ended with the question “What can you do about it?” To answer that question, and to get the inside scoop on the strategic default trend, I talked with a local real estate attorney. Here’s what I learned:
Credit score implications
- Most mortgage lenders won’t lend to people who have had a foreclosure within the last 4 years; so if you do a “strategic default” plan on renting for 4 years.
- While you may be able to get a mortgage in 4 years, the foreclosure stays on your credit report for 7 years.
- Interestingly, it’s not the foreclosure or short sale that does the most damage to your credit report — it’s all the late payments you rack up as you move toward foreclosure or a short sale.
- Fortunately, those late payments will be off your credit report in 2 years.
Legal implications
- In Arizona, there are two “anti-deficiency” statutes that protect the homeowner’s wages and other assets from the bank. In other words, if you default on your mortgage loan, the bank can take the collateral for that loan (the house) but has no other recourse. Not every state has those anti-deficiency statutes.
- If you have a second mortgage, as long as it was used as “purchase money” — to buy the home (as in an 80/20 mortgage) — the bank cannot come after your wages or other assets if you default on that loan.
- If you default, the bank has two options: 1) it can sue you in court; or 2) it can foreclose through a trustee sale. The second, as the cheaper and faster option, is the most common.
- If you decide to do a strategic default, you’ll probably have about 6 months from when you stop paying until the home is foreclosed. 10 months is not uncommon. But the only time guarantee is that the bank is required to notify you 91 days in advance of the trustee sale (the date the home will actually be foreclosed).
Tax implications
- There is a “forgiveness of debt tax” but it doesn’t apply as long as you’ve lived in your home for at least 2 of the last 5 years and the mortgage was used entirely as “purchase money” — to buy the house.
- There is an additional form you’ll have to submit to the IRS. Talk to your accountant.
Other options
- If you make the decision to do a “strategic default” you should be sure that you’re comfortable with foreclosure as a possible end result. That said, there are some other options you could pursue with the lender.
- One alternative to foreclosure is a short sale. You sell your home as you normally would, but the bank has to agree to the purchase price — which will be some amount less than what you owe on the home. The bank takes a loss on the difference between what you owe and the proceeds of the sale.
- A short sale will still be a negative mark on your credit, but not as negative as a foreclosure.
- In some cases, you could negotiate with the bank not to report the late payments (those payments you miss between the time you default on the loan and when the short sale goes through) to the credit bureaus.
- Another option is to negotiate down your mortgage principle. If you’ve decided already that you’re willing to accept a foreclosure, if that’s the end result, you could call the bank and ask them to reduce the principle you owe on your mortgage to the market value (or close to). If you no longer have negative equity (or as much negative equity), that should eliminate the reason you decided to do a “strategic default” in the first place.
I have to say that I am not an attorney and none of the information I’ve presented here should be construed as legal advice. If you have questions about foreclosure or “strategic defaults” or are thinking about defaulting on your mortgage, consult with a legal professional.
What do you think? Have you thought about a “strategic default”? Click on the “Comments” link below and join the discussion!

COMMENTS (3)
In my opinion this practice is appalling! Two key opinions on the subject: Number one: Assume you are the mortgage holder/note holder. You made a loan in good faith; the buyer made a loan in good faith - now the buyer intentionally defaults sticking you with yet another foreclosure. With a cavalier opinion that they can just go get another loan, buy another house at the now at discounted depressed market price. I have this exact scenario, I buy seller financed notes, I have several notes on properties in Florida and (these notes are current and not the “strategic default"). The buyer had 700+ credit scores 90 days ago (over 40 mortgages paid as agreed and several hundred thousand dollars in equity lines of credit, now all in default, credit scores under 500) all with the express intentional act of forcing his current mortgage lender to reduce his $800,000 mortgage because now his home is worth $400,000. Do you want to buy those notes? Now assume you are the "new lender" on his new purchase what is to prevent this person of such high moral character to do the same thing again this time to you? Would you make a loan to someone who intentionally defrauded his or her former lender? I don't think so, this action completely destroys the credit industry and the credit risk scoring models that our present credit system is built on. And who are these "big lenders" that get stuck with the huge losses, they are us-the American people with our savings, retirement 401 K. stock market investments and taxes. Number two: Assume the reverse were true, you buy a house at $100,000 (assume 100% financing $100,000) the House APPRECIATES in value to $200,000 and your mortgage lender doubles your mortgage to $200,000? No... Why not? The House doubled in value, they should be entitled to more profit. There would be such a public outcry, picketing in the streets; every politician and his dog would be in on that one. To embrace such an action, as a strategic default because of negative equity is to embrace the opposite the property goes up in value... the mortgage goes up. Conclusion: Anyone who is identified as strategically defaulting on their mortgage obligation simply because their property is negative equity should be BLACK BALLED from the credit industry for life! Just like card counters in Vegas, you get caught your name goes in the Black book and you are barred from gambling forever. You get caught strategically defaulting you are barred from credit for life. August 26, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Interesting rebuttal Randy, except there is a flaw in your argument. The risk models that were used to LEND the money in the first place were so watered down BY GOVERNMENT REQUEST, that the market was flooded with people able to buy houses that could not afford them. Thus the risk models that allowed the dramatic increases in home prices artificially raised those prices beyond the true valuation of th property. Thus when the high risk people default on their loans and then the government bails out the banks for making those bad decisions (following the governments advice) it is the people who followed the rules, bought only what they could afford and are able to make payments who get stuck and hurt the most. It was the people making the loans (includes the government) that caused the gross appreciations that led to the current situation. If banks and other loaners had maintained the standards they had set for home loans, not got greedy by selling the securities thereby watering down the risk within those securities and making the risk unknown, the current situation would not be nearly as bad, people wouldn't be 35% underwater, but would but maybe 5-10%, a level that may be recouped. January 26, 2010 at 7:59 am
Randy what Bank do you work for? Your Black Ball thing is not worth spouting about. This stragetic default thing is the American way and very disturbing. People today just flat refuse to expect that they made a mistake. It is this scary lack of taking ownership of mistakes that is sure to led to the downfall of the American society as we know it. It was greed and incredible lack of oversight that force housing market higher and it was reality that says what goes up must come down. Real estate agents, banks, appraisers, and polictians all with no idea of the realities of market ebbs and flows caused this beginning of the end. However the biggest problem is the public at large...without any of the restraints of our forefathers of just the last generation; we caused this and we will suffer under its wieght. January 26, 2010 at 8:54 am